By Anis Chowdhury / Jomo Kwame Sundaram

Decades of public health cuts have quietly taken a huge human toll, now even more pronounced with the pandemic. Austerity programs, by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, have forced countries to cut public spending, including health provisioning.

'Government is the problem'

"India's COVID crisis: A deadly example of government failure", "Government failures still hamper [UK] COVID-19 response". Such headlines have become commonplace as the pandemic rages on, with no sign of ending soon. Their godparents deserve due recognition.

UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher claimed, "no government can do anything [good]… people look to themselves first… There is no such thing as society … quality of our lives will depend upon how much each of us is prepared to take responsibility for ourselves and each of us prepared to turn round and help by our own efforts those who are unfortunate".

US President Ronald Reagan declared, "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem". Inspired by them, government capacities and public sectors have been decimated in recent decades, ostensibly to liberate entrepreneurship and progress.

Four decades of defunding, delegitimization and demoralization of governments and their personnel since Thatcher and Reagan have taken their toll. Unsurprisingly, most governments have failed to respond more adequately to the pandemic.

To justify social spending cuts, politicians of various hues the world over have been parroting mantras that government is too big and bad. 'New Democrat' US President Bill Clinton proudly declared the "era of big government is over". 

Neoliberal reforms worse

This 'politics of small government' legitimized privatization of public assets and services. Authorities have tripped over one another to privatize potentially lucrative public sector duties and activities, while reducing taxes and expenditure.

COVID-19 has revealed the nature and purpose of neoliberal health spending reforms. New policies have included privation and contracting out public services. Social spending has not only been cut, but also used to pay private suppliers.

Health system failures highlighted by the pandemic have been long in the making. Four decades of neoliberal policies — including marketization, or commodification of healthcare — have greatly increased private provisioning.

Private healthcare provisioning in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) took off in the 1990s. It gathered pace after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis with more hedge fund and other investments in hospitals and allied health services.

Such provisioning now accounts for most health services in many LMICs, catering mainly to medical tourists and patients with means. Thus, profit considerations and financial markets have remade LMICs' national health systems.

Unhealthy reforms

Increasingly privatized and outsourced, public health systems in developing countries have been underfunded, undermined and understaffed. Fractured health systems, with poor governance and regulation, have become even less able to respond well to new challenges.

Such changes have been promoted by new aid-sponsored financial arrangements, such as public-private partnerships, as urged by the World Bank. The pandemic has exposed the results as grossly inadequate, ill-suited and vulnerable.aising morbidity and mortality.

Meanwhile, donors have been diverting ai

Profitable private services remain parallel to and separate from the public system. The reforms have not only undermined public health systems, but also weakened governments' ability to cope. Even in rich countries, about 40% of health spending is now for private services.

Neither privatization nor commodification have improved the quality of care, equity and efficiency of public services. Thus, deregulation, privatization and liberalization have squeezed health access, raising morbidity and mortality.

Meanwhile, donors have been diverting aid from governments to non-government organizations (NGOs), especially 'international' ones. But patchworks of foreign-run NGOs are no substitute for integrated national public healthcare systems. 

Austerity kills

Analyses of economic shocks around the world, from the 1930s' Great Depression to the 2008-2009 Great Recession, show fiscal austerity kills. In England since 2010, austerity has been linked to 120,000 more deaths and over 30,000 suicide attempts.

Despite declining alcohol abuse and smoking, and without counting flu and other epidemic fatalities, 100 'early deaths' daily were expected in the UK, even before the pandemic. Social security cuts have also been devastating.

Despite growing patient demand and rising healthcare costs, during 2010-2020, the UK National Health Service suffered the "largest sustained fall in … spending as a share of GDP in any period" since its creation after the Second World War.

Earlier, Greece's 2010 austerity package required cutting its national health budget by 40%. Infant mortality rose 40% after some 35,000 doctors, nurses and other health workers lost their jobs.

As Greeks avoided routine primary healthcare due to long waits and rising drug costs, hospital admissions soared. Meanwhile, mosquito eradication program cuts led to a resurgence of malaria.

 Austerity also worsened Ebola in West Africa. Cutting public health spending from 1990, Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone further weakened their already poor health systems, undermining their ability to cope with emergencies. Thus, in the year before the Ebola outbreak, Guinea spent more on debt repayment than public health.

Meanwhile, austerity-driven funding cuts to the World Health Organization (WHO) by the US, UK and European governments critically delayed responses to the Ebola outbreak, worsening it. Funding shortages also set back needed WHO efforts to respond to future global health crises.

Government not main problem

Health threats posed by the pandemic have not been well addressed by the reforms of recent decades. Some have been made worse, with LMICs particularly hard hit by COVID-19. Unsurprisingly, confidence and trust in governments everywhere have dipped.

In fact, public health investments before the pandemic were projected to yield three times as much in economic growth. Thus, such spending would have not only saved lives, but also accelerated economic expansion.

With COVID-19 endemic, and most government pandemic containment and fiscal capacities in the global South limited, the pandemic will drag on, further setting back progress and worsening inequalities.

Meanwhile, Thatcher and Reagan still haunt us all until the world exorcises their ghosts forever.

This article was originally published on KSJomo.org.

Related IPS commentaries:

1. How to sustainably finance universal health care

2. Developing countries struggling to cope with COVID-19

3. Why some national health care systems do better than others

4. Hospital PPPs undermine healthcare

5. Big business capturing UN SDG agenda?

6. PPPs likely to undermine public health commitments

(Anis Chowdhury is Adjunct Professor, Western Sydney University and University of New South Wales, Australia. Jomo Kwame Sundaram was an economics professor and United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development.)