The recent episodes of violence in school reported in the media has ignited much national discussion, with many opinions expressed as to what long-term actions should be taken.

The government leadership has discussed this on 17 October 2025 and proposed a number of measures. It is important that these measures are based on evidence—of what works—and not on opinions and “in my day” sentiments.

We look here at the proposals, in light of the evidence, and suggest whether these measures are effective and beneficial to children in schools.

Police presence at schools

After the cabinet meeting, government spokesperson Fahmi Fadzil announced at a press conference the government is considering the ‘omnipresent’ nature of the police force—“this move is aimed at ensuring that police presence in schools serves as a signal that our schools are safe places.”

Available research shows mixed findings for police presence in schools and the reduction of violence.

Some studies indicate a reduction in certain types of violence (fights, threats and drug-related activities). However, most research suggests it does not make schools safer and are linked to negative consequences for students (harsh disciplinary actions like suspensions and expulsions).

Studies suggest police presence in schools makes students feel less safe with increased anxiety/fear.

Overall, a systematic review of school-based law enforcement strategies based on 32 studies provide no evidence of safety-promotion and instead criminalized students and schools.

The use of metal detectors in Schools

Selangor MB Amirudin Shari has announced the use of metal detectors and CCTV installation at affected schools. Whether this will be rolled out to other schools is uncertain.

Evidence shows that while metal detectors might have a role in weapon deterrence or seizure, the current systematic evidence does not confirm they reduce overall school violence, and they are associated with negative consequences.

A review of the data, over many years, shows little to no impact on overall school violence and may lead to a negative perception of safety among students with some students feeling less safe.

The use of CCTVs in schools

The Selangor government has also suggested the use of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras in affected schools.

While this sounds like a good idea, the evidence and data is mixed.

There is some evidence that CCTV use was associated with a modest decrease in crime overall, mainly a reduction in vehicle crimes in car parks, but the effects on violent crime were generally small and non-significant.

Note that a recent longitudinal study found no effect. In addition, in some studies, students felt less safe with CCTVs.

Canning in schools as discipline measure

Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is quoted as saying that the government is open to giving teachers flexibility to administer caning punishment to problematic students, subject to strict guidelines. The move was suggested as an effort to discipline students.

Every single systematic review and meta-analysis on corporal punishment in schools (which includes caning) consistently indicates that its use is not effective for reducing violence or improving long-term behavior.

In fact, the evidence suggests that it is associated with negative outcomes, including increased aggression and violence among students.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has strongly stated that the use of corporal punishment in schools is not an effective or ethical method for management of behavior concerns, causes harm to students and should be abolished.

The suggestion by the government that we use canning in school is a regressive step and one completely dismissed by research and data.

Digital device and social media ban under 16 years of age

The government is considering a smartphone ban on those below the age of 16 years and to raise the minimum age for social media usage to 16 years.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, is quoted as saying that social media and online games are increasingly shaping children’s behavior.

We all recognize the enormous impact that internet connected digital devices and social media has had on society, as well as on children.

While some of it has been positive, the major impact has been negative, with a strong addictive component.

We presume here that the proposed ban on ‘smartphones’ will need to include all internet connected digital devices, like tables and computers, otherwise it could not be effective.

Current systematic reviews of the data suggest there is limited and inconclusive direct evidence that a complete ban on digital devices and social media for children under 16 years of age will directly reduce overall violence in schools.

There is some research that smartphone bans in schools does bring a modest positive effect on reducing violence like bullying.

While social media is acknowledged as playing a role in escalating youth conflict and violence, the evidence does not definitively confirm that a ban for under-16’s is an effective intervention for reducing violence.

The key will be the enforceability of such a ban which can easily be circumvented.

Many researchers and experts advocate for harm minimization approaches—such as comprehensive digital literacy education, resilience building, and fostering emotion regulation skills—over outright bans.

Bans are often ineffective and fail to equip children for responsible use in the digital world.

In summary, none of the measures suggested by the Government, or state governments, are of proven benefit. More importantly, these measures focus on the symptoms and not the root causes.

We must address the root problems of violence, such as psycho-social (mental health) needs, family challenges, a positive school culture and the failure of social media applications to protect children.

We need to work together to build a school environment and community where students feel safe and welcome, not policed.

Civil society stands ready to support the government in thinking through the issues and coming up with evidence-based, viable and meaningful solutions.

These are our children and all of us are responsible and committed to supporting them.

Please click for list of signatories.